election Social Platform National Project x
All the forces of the Faculty who compose the National Project Social x express and represent the unity of the national field, popular and Latin America. We have been working throughout the year to consolidate a student representative who is strongly committed to the transformation process is experiencing Argentina and Latin America. Our vision common in Argentina that dream, and thus vindicate the model country that has been building since 2003.
believe that there is no place for ideological vagueness or ambiguity. The UBA can no longer be the main bastion of conservative restoration attempt of radicalism and PRO, but neither can be the area of \u200b\u200bspaces with no popular representation, whether by right or left, oppose university engagement of the great transformations that have occurred over the years.
Argentine public universities can not become the subject "counter" as in other Latin American countries (Venezuela, Ecuador and Bolivia), where the student became one of the main focuses popular opposition to the changes. On the contrary, we have a responsibility to challenge and transform the hegemonic discourses (both in its liberal form of right as in its aesthetic left) to ensure that the university is an engine that will drive and deepen people's struggle.
We are convinced that the country has begun to experience a new story, a product of the creation of millions of jobs, opening of joint and collective bargaining agreements, were added 2 million new retirees, and a law was passed guaranteed increases minimum periodic retirement. We developed a human rights policy that allowed the repeal of the laws of Due Obedience and final point that allowed the opening of the trials of repressors, we performed the renewal of the Supreme Court's Office to ensure the independence of it, the Universal was created by Son benefiting more than 3 million people, enacted the Audiovisual Communication Services to ensure the voices plurarilidad, 1000 schools were built and Education budget increased more than 6% of GDP (in 2003 was 1.2% of GDP) to make public education as a fundamental tool to ensure equal opportunities to all the people of Argentina. In short, we are on a way to make possible each day, building a more just and egalitarian.
From the student movement with strength, intelligence and conviction, we take the battle front against neo-liberal attempt to restore and defend the national project and popular, along with workers and social organizations. We know that this is the way to build the country we always dreamed of, just, free and sovereign.
The university we want for the country we dream
From where we started: 7 years of the same, plus 45 days without classes
In these weeks the students of the Faculty of Social Sciences, choose who will carry the mandate of political and trade union representation in the Student Center. These choices express a series of public debates that make practical and political sense of the Centre.
After 7 years of managing the operational and Mella are witnessing a crisis of meaning of CECSO, while these forces have deepened the separation of national public debate of those who make the social community, as does Right in Economics and Law. While the redefinition of politics and the state since the 2001 crisis have returned to society conflict and debate of ideas within the framework of a process of deepening democracy, our faculty is isolated from the deep public debate.
Unfortunately those who make legitimate claims to the demands of the faculty student unions, the building only have been used by the PO and Mella an arbitrary, inefficient and unrepresentative., Introducing longer making the social history as a triumph of public education, when in fact it was an irrational measure that did nothing but cause serious political, institutional and cultural.
The decision was taken forward by a small group of young people compared with 25 thousand social forms. They emptied the power, divided the students and teachers unfairly placed in the dock. It is disappointing that in the context of national and regional political process of intense public debate, the PO and Mella, have decided to restrict the participation of students, at their claims merely corporate.
These events that happened this year - taking the power for 45 days - will inevitably accompany the electoral process and force all political groupings to establish a specific position on the matter. The question no longer is to continue discussing making itself, but now we are faced with the opportunity to discuss the type of school students who want and how we hope to channel and resolve conflicts and demands to have the student movement.
From here, we have actively participated in all meetings for the seizure of power, making clear our position to the methodology of protest, considering it as the product of a shared decision only by the current leadership of central and PO to position themselves politically in the right and out of it. This stance was evident after the uprising, claiming achievements and started describing a political context for the student struggle that is exactly the same scenario we had from day one. Business as usual in college, there is no call to award scholarships in 2011 and the building is built according to the same deadlines set earlier this year, according to which in December will be completed the second stage of the work.
The question is why while we have to fight for every brick of our unique building, the Faculty of Economics in a year had a new building. The disparity between the speed of economic work and slow social single building has only one explanation: the political decision of the rector of the UBA and its management is subject and silence all the sectors that do not share their university project. It is the same that ruled the university sector in the neo 90 'Strip radicals Residence (1983 and Academic Alternative are the expressions of that social space). The same political color is achieved economic management facilities within 12 months. Social poses to the Chancellor a source of questions for privatizing policy of higher education, therefore, not only does not provide the budget, but that slows the process of bidding for our building.
Apparently, for the Rector Hallu, there are faculties of first and second-Powers. The first are those not represent a direct threat to the reproduction of the status quo. The second, are those like Social, whose scientific activity is directly linked to the production of critical knowledge about social and political reality of our country. To Hallu and right sectors who want a university subject to the market, Social uncomfortable so to discipline the budgetary drown. In this context, the continuous efforts of our faculty have failed to live up to the circumstances, and adapt in various ways to this situation of marginalization within the UBA.
why we believe deeply that we must all commit ourselves in the discussion of what Student Center type we want, as we all are benefited or harmed by decisions that are being undertaken. Thus, we aim to build a truly pluralistic and participatory tools, to lead the transformation of the students face. We need to highlight the importance of unity of the national field, and Latin American popular face CECSO elections. Today more than ever necessary to rebuild the academic sense, social, political and cultural life of the Faculty of Social and the first step on this path, is the political unit that achieves the ultimate transformation of our student center.
From PROJECT X NATIONAL SOCIAL hold :
- Conflict with respect to the unique building:
regard to making the power, we repudiate the method and the lack of strategy chosen as a measure of strength. We believe that the classroom is not emptying the best way they should defend the public and free university, much less damaging to the entire social community with the aim focused on conflict and nationalized by the national government to a situation , as required by the statute of the UBA, we must resolve the Rector, as the university is self-sufficient and independent.
We wonder what kind of frank discussion can occur in an area where, for petition and get achievements, we must marginalize over 80% of the students, and insulting to silence those opposed to the irrationality of the measure. Clearly, if control measures and discussion had taken place in a context of classrooms filled, would have strengthened the claim and would have been possible to obtain results for the whole community. We do not believe in enlightened vanguard will lead us to great victories, but we defend a student movement active and engaged every day with his companions, who have the goal of building a faculty that contains us all.
events that occurred with the lifting of the decision were presented as great victories. But are not. Believe that a ministry was making that "ripped" $ 20 million for the work with the firm that commits the government to tender from January 1, 2011. These funds we have now are the same which are set forth in the Budget Bill for 2011 that is being treated with a strong conservative opposition in the Congress of the Nation. After making the Ministry of Education, representatives of the assembly were to negotiate with radical Hallú and More Vélez to obtain the guarantees on the construction of the third part of the building. Our question is why they waited 45 days to bring the petitions to the rector?.
Not only had an epic victory as we are led to believe, but if something was demonstrated during this conflict (and after 8 years of management PO CECS and Nick) is that these groups are not equal to circumstances to lead the student movement in Social. Take a major milestone in his CV, which is having emptied the Faculty for 45 days with the sole purpose of generating a political event that would allow them in position to the detriment of the needs of the social community.
The current management of the Centre knew he would not conduct the meeting, and never tried to avoid reckless loss of school days. Addition the delay in appointment of teachers, scholarships and payment of payroll for non-teaching staff.
As highlighted in the poster which we granted our position on the outlet, the only truth is the reality, and the building of the Faculty of Social Sciences has been building steadily since 2005, so much so that it ended in 2007 the I stage of the work and the race moved to Constitution of Social Work and in December this year will complete the second stage of the work so the 2011 school year at the new site will find the careers of Science Politics and Social Communication, ending in 2012 the third stage where the races will move Labor Relations and Sociology. The funds for the social construction of the building correspond to the items that the national government will grant to the University of Buenos Aires for infrastructure, which is the largest investment since the construction of University City.
Trade Union Proposals:
- Regulations and legal status for the CECs.
The Social Student Center should be given a status for himself that will enable us to common policies in the short, medium and long term. We believe that the Centre should not be the hunting ground of any party or external political space our faculty, but must become a tool for students for students.
therefore hold that a statute would provide a frame of reference with respect to the obligations and responsibilities that we have the different groups that are part of the Centre and have acquired rights as students in relation to it.
would allow the previous work to seek consensus among all groups, to establish the methods by which conflicts should be resolved inward union and academic faculty to avoid returning to situations like those of a few months ago where we met an assembly "self-summoned" that through endless meetings and motions stop and the power held captive to teachers, students and non-teaching for 45 days. We come from two experiences
failed as they were 5 years of Labor Party and its continuity with the Train-LA Mella, with mediocre efforts at best, away from the students and without clear policies, embodied in the rhetoric and discourse away from the problems that we all live day to day students in our school. In the case of railway policy has been more than faithful copy of the failure of PO who share together in the FUBA.
The much talked about "re-center," delayed two years, and his plan we see the same practices to they claim to oppose. Are neither more nor less, the result of the vices and practices that began and continued Strip Residence PO: rented militants in and out of space management, introducing arbitrarily balances over time and how they decide. And this is a consequence of the lack of a statute that set clear rules for all and prevent a group of silver available for students without any responsibility.
Student Ticket Extension
Notes Cheap and quality
Scholarship high notes and Budget
participatory in June 2011. Advisory
procedures and materials. CECS that function as a bridge between students and authorities of the Faculty and careers in order to channel their queries and provide prompt and efficient responses.
CECS website with real content, that includes and reflects the need of students and that is not the diary of a group, as it is today.
Presentation to National State University Mapping Project that includes mechanisms for lower-income peers who want to go to college have the opportunity.
Working together between CECS and territorial base organizations to promote inclusion in the university sector with fewer resources.
Institutional Proposals:
promote discussion on repeal of the LES and implementation of a new Law on Higher Education.
Institutionalization of University Volunteering in the new LES.
Popular Communication Program: promoting tools that serve to contribute to the implementation of the Law on Audiovisual Communication mandatory interdisciplinary workshops e interclaustros experiences that encourage community media (Radio Chart, World Villa TV, FM Radio Bajo Flores, Radio La Milagrosa of the Occult, etc.) and managed to institutionalize these practices. Promote
discussions toward Curriculum Reform for all races oriented Pedagogical Decolonization: today we know that our faculty racing bit is the thought of national and popular authors, and even subjects such as history see Argentina or Latin American national-popular processes as demagogic populism taken pejoratively. This must change.
Proposals on the Strokes:
Sociology: Fostering a career consultant who own contribution to the analysis of reality
national and local, involved in existing social processes, which also provide experience work for all students who are nearing graduation.
Communication: curriculum reform of the race, in this sense, we propose:
a) binding Media Project Workshop.
b) Incorporation into the curriculum content related to national processes and Latin America.
Political Science: Curriculum Reform in the race include:
a) An inclusive vision of the state and him as the coordinator and guarantor of citizens' rights against the economic power of corporations.
b) Breaking the vision of the political scientist as a neutral political analyst whose supreme value seems to be the positivist neutrality. Instead we seek to vindicate the idea of \u200b\u200ba subject or social scientists with reality and the transformation of its time, with social commitment and solidarity. Besides the inclusion of Argentine and Latin American authors, considering the great problems of our region.
Relations: Promote training courses articulated with social organizations and unions. At the same time consider the working class as a true subject of social and political transformations. Reassemble the research as part of student training, and coordination with state areas, such as the Ministry of Labour, INAES, and others.
Working
Social: Establish lines of work from the CECS with social movements, human rights organizations and minorities, unions, and intellectuals to create spaces for debate, training, exchange and joint action.
Join the elections, your vote can change the Center and its operating logic. Participate but we they are the winners!
change the country, now social change!
23 to November 26.
SOCIAL Rate Mandrake in the National Project. Lista19.
visit our websites:
http://lamandragorauba.blogspot.com/
http://www.facebook.com/lamandragorafsoc
http://www.twitter. com / @ LaMandragoraUBA
http://www.facebook.com/pages/Sociales-x-el-Proyecto-Nacional
http://twitter.com/socialesxpnac
0 comments:
Post a Comment